In a case of very unfortunate timing, a creditor loaned a business $500,000.00 to keep its doors open, took a security interest in the Debtor’s assets to secure the loan, and filed a UCC financing statement five days later to perfect the lien. However, on the day after the loan, and four days prior to perfection of the lien, an involuntary petition was filed against the Debtor. In re Millivision, 474 F.3d 4 (lst Cir. 2007). In this case the creditor argued that the “strong-arm” pro visions of §544 “offended the underlying equitable principles of the Bankruptcy Code by conferring a “windfall” cash infusion…” Further, it was argued that the “relation-back” provision of §5 47(e) (which allows transferees a grace period to perfect a transfer) constitutes “any generally applicable law” under §546(b), which limits the rights of a Trustee to recover under §544. Affirming the lower Courts, the First Circuit rejected the § 547(e) argument, finding that a subsection applicable to prefer entail transfers is not “generally applicable law” for purposes of the strong-arm powers under § 544 (b). The Court then noted that the creditor could have perfected its lien prior to making the loan, and “under long-established principles. Therefore the court found that petitioner’s lack of diligence precludes equity’s operation”. So yes a court has heard an equitable argument by an unperfected secured creditor and lost the argument. If you have a question about your perfected interest, please see a bankruptcy attorney.
For more information about Bankruptcy and Disability Income – contact Cynthia Remboldt, at the Remboldt Law Firm at 404-348-4081. FREE consultations can be scheduled by calling 404-348-4081. Evening and Weekend hours are available to meet with an attorney. If bankruptcy turns out to be the best way to move forward considering your alternatives, goals and financial challenges, payment plans are available if you need them.